It is indeed time to time be people who just do not understand what means political manipulation. Especially the cover of Animal Welfare has been a popular and effective means in National Socialism, the Party aims to enforce rigorously and all mankind harm. Not true? Well, you read it please here
be considered the National Socialist Reich Animal Welfare Act must be considered a historical landmark case
: while from the standpoint of animal welfare, represented a step forward
for its time, then the animal welfare questions, the Law
underlying essential part of the National Socialist ideology. The transition
of animal-to human experiments during the Third Reich is not a direct consequence of the Reich
animal protection law, but rather a consequence of an ideology their contempt for people
also legitimized by an appreciation of animals.
End of quote.
(...) The hopeful
promises of the Nazis to care step up in a takeover
to animal welfare and to support the association's objective
(Schweiger, 1993), have probably contributed to the animal protection movement
to large parts always politically to the right moved .(...) unquote
and added: rose
The animal welfare groups, whose self-confidence as a result of political lobbying by the NSDAP
constantly stated that they
with the "Grimme act" of course not satisfied. The National Socialist Socialist
magazines succeeded admirably, however, draw the animal rights activists with the prospect
to an animal testing ban for ever under the spell of the party.
asked Blatant the youth magazine "The White Flag, 1933 (No. 14,
p. 404-406):" Do you know that your leader fiercest opponents of any animal cruelty,
especially the vivisection, the "scientific" animal torture, this
horrific offspring of Jewish-materialistic medicine in
he explains, that will be finalized in the National Socialist state these states very soon
?"(...) There
how many German parties today that appeal to exactly the same argument her voters? No one will call Hitler and his henchmen still seriously as a true animal lover. But even then it was clear how easily the masses with this issue can be manipulated.
resonance, like a cartoon from the satirical magazine Kladderadatsch
(09/03/1933) occupied. The uniformed Goering proceeds from a parade of laboratory animals
who have raised their hand in a Nazi salute and his "Heil Goring
recall (see Figure 1). This successful
irony of Goering's "cultural event" shows that at least initially
critical and even mocking voices were present, the
in the decree - saw a political control and the work of a dubious
love of animals .(...)
end of quote - not without reason.
As the commentary on the commentary proves undoubtedly are today not many are able to recognize when animal welfare is used as a manipulation factor, and even less to see that just this in animal welfare to be used as before.
refer someone who shows this situation to a doctor, paints a clear picture of non-critical distance from reality, of servile demgleichen servility, which allowed the rise of the Nazis first.
Quote:
Empire Animal Welfare Act and its provisions
was with the official entry into force of the kingdom of animal protection law on 01/02/1934
as cruelty to animals now, "torture or ill-treating an animal unnecessarily crude".
text of the law explained the terms "unnecessary", "torture" "abuse",
and "raw" to dispel any ambiguities in the definition. For example
explicitly restricted or even prohibited cruelty to animals related
in Section 2, a sheet of keeping a pet on the docking of horses tails
to using of pit ponies
schlägt.Erst in the third section, the "testing on animals" theme
and set binding regulations. Here are
to mention in particular the paragraphs
§ § 7 and 8, the animal testing as rigorously regulated than ever before in
the German animal protection legislation.
were also remarkably strict rules for the experimental procedure itself
then were - if possible - lower
animals (rats, mice, guinea pigs, etc.) the higher animals
(eg, monkeys, dogs, cats, etc.) in experiments preferable
End of quote.
How perverse this type of animal protection had had experience of millions of Jews, the sick, the disabled and children painfully
they were used instead of animals for experimental trials, but there was no single law that these people love animals before the allegedly Nazis would have protected ...
similarities to today's developments are not accidental but the result of conscious manipulation, use of proven techniques from the 3rd Reich, which was fed by narrow-mindedness and superficiality of much of the German population.
Shortly after the adoption of the law, there was a restriction
other public reporting of vivisection, what long-term
led to that established journals of the anti-Vivisektionsbewegung their appearance
stopped, for example, in 1935, " animals and humans and
1936," animal rights and animal welfare . In the totalitarian Nazi state was
agitation desired no more from now: On 12/6/1933 was Minister of the Interior
Frick "in the interest of an orderly and effective animal protection" of a
"reorganization and uniformity of the German animal protection societies"
(SCHWEIGER, 1993, 100) agreed. This also explains why the animal protection societies
no representatives in the review committees for the monitoring University Institute of
could send.
The German animal welfare movement had prepared with their pandering to the Nazis for many years the way to irrelevance.
the Hygiene Institute of the Waffen-SS in Berlin practiced without moral concernsThe National Socialist Welfare idea implies
and with government support the smooth transition from animal to human
attempt. Diary of an institute employee
give information: "As the animal does not allow adequate evaluation, must
experiments are conducted on humans." (Quoted by SCHNABEL, 1952)
And yet this is only one side of the coin; but received only
the important war research grants permission to cross the unrestricted animal welfare, the de facto suspension of the animal kingdom
Protection Act, but above all - and that weighs much more difficult - to
ruthless disregard for human dignity.
namely, a radical shift in human-animal hierarchy:
Where
animals are not for its own sake and not because of ethical motives protected
, but as an ideological component of an Aryan-to nature to enjoy
national community protection, be fatally moral
Landmarks moved: "We Germans, we were the only people in the world
a decent attitude towards animals, will indeed take on these people
animals a decent attitude." (Quoted by HOFER,
1971, 113), said Heinrich Himmler in his notorious speech in 1943 Poznan
in regard to the murder of the Slavic population in the occupied eastern territories
. Where this "decency" led is known.
And this attitude has seen significant at present again the satirical commentary.
This propaganda policy in the name of animal welfare do not get a chance.
cited and further reading
ADAM, UD (1977): Universities and National Socialism. The University of Tuebingen in
Third Reich. Tübingen
ALY, G. & C. Prosser (ed.) (1989): The value of man. Medicine in Germany 1918 -
1945th Editor: Medical Association in cooperation with the Federal Medical Association, Berlin
Arluk, A. & B. SAX (1992): Understanding Nazi Animal Protection and the Holocaust.
Anthrozoös, H. 5, 6-31
Brumm, MF, (1994): "Glorious the iron broom sweeps through the German countryside." The
veterinarians and the year 1933. In: C. Meinel & Voswinckel P. (eds): Medicine, Science,
technology and National Socialism, Stuttgart, 173-182
Büchner, F. (1958): eulogy for Paul Uhlenhuth. In: Paul Uhlenhuth to memory.
Journal of Immunology and Experimental Therapy 115 (4), 234-235
FEDERAL MINISTRY OF FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY (ed.) (2000):
animal welfare concerns us all. Bonn
Doerner, K., A. & K. Ebbinghaus LINNE
0 comments:
Post a Comment